tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456688.post8354163973673855178..comments2024-03-28T22:59:15.275+04:00Comments on UAE Community Blog: "US developer in $1bn Dubai property test case"secretdubaihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13115610824191031176noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456688.post-78429114841406280362008-02-03T20:26:00.000+04:002008-02-03T20:26:00.000+04:00Nick - perhaps they are seeking added punitive dam...Nick - perhaps they are seeking added punitive damages (which usually is the largest chunk of a lawsuit) + interest + lost business opportunity and other menial costs?<BR/><BR/>I'd still like to know of the protected archaeological site - anyone, anybody know of this?roshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03271894997251528158noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456688.post-45839251835142734082008-02-03T16:56:00.000+04:002008-02-03T16:56:00.000+04:00Jazz, that's unlikely. The maximum damages that co...Jazz, that's unlikely. The maximum damages that could be awarded would surely not be more than the maximum profit that could feasibly be made from this investment, which would be less than the 1bn. They are unlikely to have lost all 1bn that they were going to invest?huthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09299456569511629114noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456688.post-73200930430073518842008-02-02T17:20:00.000+04:002008-02-02T17:20:00.000+04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Assistant Editorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00819591748492509564noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456688.post-22795278058823562172008-02-02T13:47:00.000+04:002008-02-02T13:47:00.000+04:00Is it possible to say (for the sake of argument) t...Is it possible to say (for the sake of argument) that Capital Partners may have found a loophole in the agreement with Tecom that could fetch them more money in a lawsuit than the investment itself?Dubai Jazzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17951647402774044439noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15456688.post-40431324401736034852008-02-02T07:14:00.000+04:002008-02-02T07:14:00.000+04:00"revolves around the existence of a protected arch..."revolves around the existence of a protected archaeological site"<BR/><BR/>Does anyone know of the site in reference?roshhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03271894997251528158noreply@blogger.com